Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for GE inverter using EMC controller #905

Closed
springfall2008 opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Support for GE inverter using EMC controller #905

springfall2008 opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@springfall2008
Copy link
Owner

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Support for multi-inverters controlled by the offical GE EMC module

Describe the solution you'd like
Integration into Predbat

Describe alternatives you've considered
Disable EMC and use GivTCP

Additional context
Discussions ongoing with GE about supporting this controller

There is no local interface so it must be via cloud controls

@springfall2008 springfall2008 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 1, 2024
springfall2008 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2024
* EMC changes #905

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci-lite[bot] <117423508+pre-commit-ci-lite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@gcoan
Copy link
Collaborator

gcoan commented Apr 1, 2024

Great to hear you've got a line of communication to GE and an interesting development but personally low priority for me.

EMC due date - who knows with any realistic certainty?
Likely audience for the EMC will be limited to multi-AC users in the first instance, maybe multi AIO and hybrid in the longer term, but again, when?
Cloud control only, a big turn-off as that then puts ongoing operation/free access etc entirely at the whim of GivEnergy
And then a Q of the affordability of the EMC.

@springfall2008
Copy link
Owner Author

Now rolled out and working

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants