Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Async functionality #287

Open
3 of 10 tasks
clehner opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
3 of 10 tasks

Async functionality #287

clehner opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@clehner
Copy link
Contributor

clehner commented Apr 12, 2022

Bindings should be async where possible.

Current status of what in DIDKit supports async usage

... with notes and pointers to relevant issues/PRs:

@clehner clehner added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 12, 2022
@clehner clehner mentioned this issue May 10, 2022
5 tasks
@svanegmond
Copy link

Please don't make this API async. It's 99% local computation. I am right now struggling with trying to use it from django; it hangs when served with gunicorn, not when served with the development server

@sbihel
Copy link
Member

sbihel commented May 23, 2024

Please don't make this API async. It's 99% local computation. I am right now struggling with trying to use it from django; it hangs when served with gunicorn, not when served with the development server

Could you open an issue on https://github.com/spruceid/didkit-python so we can see if something can be done on DIDKit's side?

@svanegmond
Copy link

svanegmond commented May 24, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants