Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR: Add constraint for jupyter_client version on conda based test #16389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 10, 2021

Conversation

dalthviz
Copy link
Member

@dalthviz dalthviz commented Sep 9, 2021

Description of Changes

CI tests with conda failing due to jupyter_client 7.x being available in the conda main channel

Affirmation

By submitting this Pull Request or typing my (user)name below,
I affirm the Developer Certificate of Origin
with respect to all commits and content included in this PR,
and understand I am releasing the same under Spyder's MIT (Expat) license.

I certify the above statement is true and correct: dalthviz

@dalthviz dalthviz self-assigned this Sep 9, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dalthviz, now that I see our tests failing I recalled the problem with the approach you're trying so far. Since we have a test that checks our dependencies among setup.py, Binder, conda.txt and dependencies.py are in sync, you'd need to add this constraint to all of them.

But in this case that's not really necessary because we depend indirectly on jupyter-client (through Spyder-kernels). So the right thing to do is to add it to .github/scripts/install.sh.

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 changed the title PR: Add constrain for jupyter_client version on conda based test PR: Add constraint for jupyter_client version on conda based test Sep 9, 2021
@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 added this to the v5.1.4 milestone Sep 10, 2021
@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 merged commit ed3113a into spyder-ide:5.x Sep 10, 2021
ccordoba12 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants