Followup / fixup: apply 'black' code formatting to a couple of missed docstrings #1228
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CaselIT
requested review from
sqlalchemy-bot and
sqla-tester
and removed request for
sqlalchemy-bot
sqla-tester
reviewed
Apr 26, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, this is sqla-tester setting up my work on behalf of CaselIT to try to get revision f5696b9 of this pull request into gerrit so we can run tests and reviews and stuff
|
New Gerrit review created for change f5696b9: https://gerrit.sqlalchemy.org/c/sqlalchemy/alembic/+/4587 |
|
Gerrit review https://gerrit.sqlalchemy.org/c/sqlalchemy/alembic/+/4587 has been merged. Congratulations! :) |
jayaddison
deleted the
issue-1220-followup/apply-overlooked-black-code-formatting
branch
|
Thanks again @CaselIT! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Follow-up / completion of #1220. That change updated a number of docstrings within the codebase to use standardised
blackcode formatting, but a couple of locations had been missed.Checklist
This pull request is: