New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mappedcollection converter is obsolete, conflicts with bulk_replace #3604
Comments
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Michael Bayer (@zzzeek) wrote: |
Michael Bayer (@zzzeek) wrote: this is a subtle issue not making much impact, moving out |
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Michael Bayer (@zzzeek) wrote: not sure how do to do it yet |
Michael Bayer (@zzzeek) wrote: I think it's not really worth changing. The single-item |
Michael Bayer (@zzzeek) wrote: Additionally, the "bulk_replace" event receives only the values and not the keys - doing a fully key-wise bulk set here would require changing the event interface. But again, it's to set the dictionary to a state that by definition can't be persisted, since keys have to be deriveable from the values. |
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Michael Bayer (@zzzeek) wrote: can't really emit a warning either as the "converter" is getting in the way of being able to use the |
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Michael Bayer (@zzzeek) wrote: Remove MappedCollection converter; deprecate @converter Removed the collection converter used by the :class: Overall, @converter is superseded by the Fixes: #3604 → fe8ddb7 |
Changes by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek):
|
Migrated issue, originally created by Michael Bayer (@zzzeek)
e.g. make setitem and set symmetric; if users want validation that would be a separate event. partial patch forthcoming
Attachments: 3604.patch
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: