Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SQLite3] Use generic TLP Where oracle #942

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

malwaregarry
Copy link
Contributor

rebased from #941

@malwaregarry malwaregarry changed the title [SQLite3] Use generic TLPwhere oracle [SQLite3] Use generic TLP Where oracle May 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mrigger mrigger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I guess we can merge this?

public void check() throws SQLException {
S s = state.getSchema();
AbstractTables<T, C> targetTables = TestOracleUtils.getRandomTableNonEmptyTables(s);
gen = gen.setTablesAndColumns(targetTables);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not related to this PR, but I was a bit confused by this. The set somewhat suggests that we set a value in the existing generator, but actually, we create a new generator. Can we reflect this in the naming of the methods? E.g., newWithTablesandColumns or copyWithTablesAndColumns or so?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants