Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug where L034 should ignore INSERT or "CREATE TABLE AS SELECT" with CTE #4108

Conversation

barrywhart
Copy link
Member

Brief summary of the change made

Fixes #4105

Are there any other side effects of this change that we should be aware of?

Pull Request checklist

  • Please confirm you have completed any of the necessary steps below.

  • Included test cases to demonstrate any code changes, which may be one or more of the following:

    • .yml rule test cases in test/fixtures/rules/std_rule_cases.
    • .sql/.yml parser test cases in test/fixtures/dialects (note YML files can be auto generated with tox -e generate-fixture-yml).
    • Full autofix test cases in test/fixtures/linter/autofix.
    • Other.
  • Added appropriate documentation for the change.

  • Created GitHub issues for any relevant followup/future enhancements if appropriate.

Copy link
Member

@tunetheweb tunetheweb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, with two small suggestions for improvements if you wanna take them on.

@@ -94,10 +94,24 @@ def _eval(self, context: RuleContext) -> EvalResultType:
"insert_statement", "set_expression"
):
return None
if (
len(context.parent_stack) >= 3
and context.parent_stack[-3].is_type("insert_statement", "set_expression")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should you have a set_expression test case?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to create one, but couldn't get it to parse.

src/sqlfluff/rules/L034.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (aebfd56) compared to base (0b37a73).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #4108   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          193       193           
  Lines        14806     14810    +4     
=========================================
+ Hits         14806     14810    +4     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sqlfluff/rules/L034.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@barrywhart barrywhart merged commit 7557398 into sqlfluff:main Nov 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rule 34 : SQlfluff doesn't ignore this rule for INSER INTO statements
2 participants