Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Regenerating database model to reflect new client and group owner col… #1150

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 25, 2022
Merged

Regenerating database model to reflect new client and group owner col… #1150

merged 1 commit into from Oct 25, 2022

Conversation

mmontgomery-square
Copy link
Contributor

…umns and indexes

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 77.498% when pulling 65cd1c0 on mmontgomery/datasec-693 into 456b8c8 on master.

cathy-yun-fu
cathy-yun-fu approved these changes Oct 24, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@cathy-yun-fu cathy-yun-fu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can you include what script you ran in the PR description? ty!

@mmontgomery-square mmontgomery-square merged commit 8ab100c into master Oct 25, 2022
@mmontgomery-square mmontgomery-square deleted the mmontgomery/datasec-693 branch October 25, 2022 17:42
@mmontgomery-square
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI I force-merged this due to an out-of-order issue with approvals (Cathy approved before the new owning team was added to the owners file).

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@cathy-yun-fu cathy-yun-fu cathy-yun-fu approved these changes

@mbyczkowski mbyczkowski Awaiting requested review from mbyczkowski

@jdtw jdtw Awaiting requested review from jdtw

@violetd12 violetd12 Awaiting requested review from violetd12

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@mmontgomery-square @coveralls @cathy-yun-fu