Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update protos to proto3 #137

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Update protos to proto3 #137

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

szabado
Copy link
Collaborator

@szabado szabado commented Jan 11, 2019

They seemed to already be at version 3, but they hadn't been recompiled. Proto3 required an update to grpc, which changed from using golang.org/x/net/context to context, which required some pretty expansive updates.

Changed from using reflect.DeepEqual to proto.Equal because of the XXX_ fields in proto3 structs.

Felix Jancso-Szabo added 2 commits January 11, 2019 10:08
Ran `dep ensure`, it updated the format of the lock file and added some
fields.  Commiting to a have a cleaner history.
Recompiled the protos, which required updating a bunch of deps to
transition from golang.org/x/net/context to context and the version of
grpc supporting proto3.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 11, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 792

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 68.097%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 790: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 476
Relevant Lines: 699

💛 - Coveralls

@szabado
Copy link
Collaborator Author

szabado commented Jan 11, 2019

Need to do some more testing. This'll be back later

@szabado szabado closed this Jan 11, 2019
@szabado szabado deleted the proto3_update branch January 29, 2019 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants