Fix WorkflowPool to work with ConflatedBroadcastChannel. #475
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before, the renderings stream came from a regular
Channel
, and the replay/cachinghappened downstream. In the legacy integration code, this meant that when a V2 workflow emitted
an output and got cancelled, the pool would immediately see the renderings channel was closed on the next
onWorkflowUpdate
and emitFinished
. Now that it's backed by aConflatedBroadcastChannel
, it willalways emit the last-emitted value on subscription before sending the close signal. This means the
pool will always see the last state, and emit
Running
, which means the v2 workflow just gets restartedon the next iteration. Fixed by explicitly checking the
isActive
flag on the workflow's job beforeemitting
Running
.