Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Explain that nix is not required #32

Closed
srid opened this issue Aug 7, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Explain that nix is not required #32

srid opened this issue Aug 7, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Milestone
Initial public re...

Comments

@srid
Copy link
Owner

srid commented Aug 7, 2019 •
edited
Loading

From @rkaippully

  • Is nix required? The doc is worded to suggest that way, but I suspect it’s not mandatory. There are a lot of haskellers that do not use nix, so this might be a barrier to entry.
@srid srid added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 7, 2019
@srid srid added this to the Initial public release milestone Aug 7, 2019
@srid
Copy link
Owner Author

srid commented Aug 7, 2019 •
edited
Loading

  • Upload to Hackage (WAIT on authorization)
  • Ensure that rib-sample works with plain cabal new-run

srid added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2019
@srid
Indicate that Nix is optional
07944dc 
Closes #32
@srid srid closed this as completed Aug 22, 2019
srid added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2019
@srid
Indicate that Nix is optional
fb3febe 
Closes #32

(cherry picked from commit 07944dc)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Initial public release
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@srid