Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency babel-eslint to v10.0.1 #50

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2018

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 27, 2018

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change References
babel-eslint devDependencies patch 10.0.0 -> 10.0.1 source

Release Notes

babel/babel-eslint

v10.0.1

Compare Source

v10.0.1

The TypeAlias "conversion" to a function has issues. Sounds like we need to rethink the change, most likely we can just actually change the scoping rather than hardcode an AST change.


Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 27, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-3.3%) to 70.466% when pulling 36c0026 on renovate/babel-eslint-10.x into 733fb81 on master.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/babel-eslint-10.x branch from 3f93fe4 to 36c0026 Compare December 8, 2018 18:27
@srtucker22 srtucker22 merged commit d991372 into master Dec 15, 2018
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/babel-eslint-10.x branch December 15, 2018 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants