Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scuttle-cleanup #1

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

scuttle-cleanup #1

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mixmix
Copy link
Member

@mixmix mixmix commented Nov 8, 2018

Cryptix said

also clean up some of the sodium-native handling.
I have the strong feeling those also need the app/ path

also clean up some of the sodium-native handling.
I have the strong feeling those also need the app/ path
@mixmix
Copy link
Member Author

mixmix commented Nov 8, 2018

@cryptix I'm just discovering your work, and also looking at extending it with some other files I was finding I needed when I ran this AppImage on a fresh kubuntu 18.10 install

],
"extraFiles": [
"app/node_modules/sodium-native/prebuilds/${os}-${arch}/electron-57.node",
"app/node_modules/sodium-native/prebuilds/${os}-${arch}/libsodium.*",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you help me get my head around why it's safe to move these prebuilds from files to extraFiles @cryptix ?
What's the difference ... I read the docs and found it kinda opaque

package.json Outdated
"asarUnpack": [
"node_modules/sodium-native/prebuilds"
],
"npmSkipBuildFromSource": true,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did you remove these two options @cryptix ?

is it because asarUnpack by default hits the node_modules?
I would have thought skipBuiild... would be good because it gets you prebuilts?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added these back in for the moment

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 9, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jan 9, 2019
@mixmix
Copy link
Member Author

mixmix commented Jan 9, 2019 via email

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jan 9, 2019
@mixmix mixmix mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2019
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants