-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix up the uproot getting started #486
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 91.15% // Head: 91.15% // No change to project coverage 👍
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #486 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 91.15% 91.15%
========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 226 226
Branches 6 6
========================================
Hits 206 206
Misses 16 16
Partials 4 4 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
import awkward as ak | ||
|
||
dataset_name = [ | ||
"https://xrootd-local.unl.edu:1094//store/user/AGC/nanoAOD/nanoaod15.root" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I am not aware of any intention of moving this file, I am wondering whether in the longer term it would be safer to use scikit-hep-testdata (or an IRIS-HEP version of such a repository). A potential issue of the file disappearing would be alleviated by CI of course that could catch it when it happens.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strong agree here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems more robust too
Update the
uproot
query in getting started: