Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why SHA256 and not SHA512 #46

Closed
15w34r0n3D4y opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Why SHA256 and not SHA512 #46

15w34r0n3D4y opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@15w34r0n3D4y
Copy link

How can I use SHA512 and not SHA256 password?
@stamparm
Copy link
Owner

SHA256 is quite enough IMO. Transferring huge digest (like SHA512) instead of SHA256 is maybe just an overkill. Is there a good argument for usage of SHA512 vs SHA256 from your side?

@stamparm stamparm closed this as completed Jan 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@stamparm @15w34r0n3D4y