Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use lodash instead of mout #51

Closed
koresar opened this issue Mar 4, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Use lodash instead of mout #51

koresar opened this issue Mar 4, 2015 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@koresar
Copy link
Member

koresar commented Mar 4, 2015

Since lodash v3.0 you can require('lodash/object/merge') exactly the same way as we do with mout.

Lodash is a bit faster, a bit smaller, uses a bit less memory.

Additionally, lodash has _.matches function which could be handy implementing #50.

Also lodash is under active development, have better online docs and JSDoc.

@ericelliott
Copy link
Contributor

Absolutely agreed, and IMO should be a good thing to add to 2.0.

👍

@koresar
Copy link
Member Author

koresar commented May 24, 2015

Implemented with #63 and #60.

@koresar koresar closed this as completed May 24, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants