error: subscript out of bounds

[bgoodri]

If you do

fit1 <- stan_glm(Volume ~ log(Girth) + log(Height), data = trees,  family = gaussian(link = 'log'))
launch_shinystan(fit1)

and go to NUTS (Plots), you get the error message and in the console it says

Error in samps_post_warmup[if (!is.null(sel)) sel, , "lp__"] : 
  subscript out of bounds

This may have to do with it being renamed "log-posterior"?

[jgabry]

It definitely has to do with the name change. I had not noticed that. Is
this changing in rstan too or are you just renaming it in rstanarm? If it's
just rstanarm then I can put in a special case for that.

On Thursday, August 13, 2015, bgoodri notifications@github.com wrote:

If you do

fit1 <- stan_glm(Volume ~ log(Girth) + log(Height), data = trees, family = gaussian(link = 'log'))
launch_shinystan(fit1)

and go to NUTS (Plots), you get the error message and in the console it
says

Error in samps_post_warmup[if (!is.null(sel)) sel, , "lp__"] :
subscript out of bounds

This may have to do with it being renamed "log-posterior"?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#88.

[bgoodri]

It is just in rstanarm at the moment, but I could imagine any number of
packages the depend on Stan doing something like that. It may be best to
just call get_log_posterior() rather than rely on hard-coded names.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Jonah Gabry notifications@github.com
wrote:

It definitely has to do with the name change. I had not noticed that. Is
this changing in rstan too or are you just renaming it in rstanarm? If it's
just rstanarm then I can put in a special case for that.

On Thursday, August 13, 2015, bgoodri notifications@github.com wrote:

If you do

fit1 <- stan_glm(Volume ~ log(Girth) + log(Height), data = trees, family
= gaussian(link = 'log'))
launch_shinystan(fit1)

and go to NUTS (Plots), you get the error message and in the console it
says

Error in samps_post_warmup[if (!is.null(sel)) sel, , "lp__"] :
subscript out of bounds

This may have to do with it being renamed "log-posterior"?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#88.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#88 (comment).

[jgabry]

If get_log_posterior is sticking around then yeah I'll just use that.

On Thursday, August 13, 2015, bgoodri notifications@github.com wrote:

It is just in rstanarm at the moment, but I could imagine any number of
packages the depend on Stan doing something like that. It may be best to
just call get_log_posterior() rather than rely on hard-coded names.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Jonah Gabry <notifications@github.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');>
wrote:

It definitely has to do with the name change. I had not noticed that. Is
this changing in rstan too or are you just renaming it in rstanarm? If
it's
just rstanarm then I can put in a special case for that.

On Thursday, August 13, 2015, bgoodri <notifications@github.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');> wrote:

If you do

fit1 <- stan_glm(Volume ~ log(Girth) + log(Height), data = trees,
family
= gaussian(link = 'log'))
launch_shinystan(fit1)

and go to NUTS (Plots), you get the error message and in the console it
says

Error in samps_post_warmup[if (!is.null(sel)) sel, , "lp__"] :
subscript out of bounds

This may have to do with it being renamed "log-posterior"?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#88.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<#88 (comment)
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#88 (comment).