Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update case-studies.md #127

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2020
Merged

Update case-studies.md #127

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2020

Conversation

hyunjimoon
Copy link

add gaussian process case study description

add gaussian process case study description
@jgabry
Copy link
Member

jgabry commented Oct 12, 2020

Thanks @hyunjimoon! Have you received any feedback on this case study yet? If not I can try to find someone to give you feedback on this who is more of a gaussian process person than I am.

@hyunjimoon
Copy link
Author

hyunjimoon commented Oct 13, 2020

I have received the following feedback through the mail from Ben Bales, Michael Betancourt, Bob Carpenter. There were some conflicting points but did my best to address them.

  • keep them simple and focused, could use simulated data as engine failure details are more distracting than helpful -> Made amends by deleting some models. I tried to focus on following the Bayesian workflow.

  • add data description and goals of analysis -> added link to stancon talk youtube and inserted the following:

This casestudy shows how identification and underfitting problems diagnosed from pushforward and predictive checks are addressed through reparameterization and adding variables. Basically our data is highly unbalanced per category with lots of missing data. Also, due to its hierarchical structure of a system, such as shared engine types, hierarchical model is applicable.

  • I like case studies with real data. If the engine failure data is a nice illustration of some aspect of GPs, that's great---it doesn't have to be the best possible model for the engine failure data.

@jgabry jgabry merged commit 990dc11 into stan-dev:master Oct 15, 2020
@jgabry
Copy link
Member

jgabry commented Oct 15, 2020

Ok great, just wanted to make sure that at least one person gave you feedback. Will merge this now!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants