You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Stan makes some particular constraint choices to map between constrained and unconstrained parameterizations, such as covariance matrices being Cholesky factors on the unconstrained scale and simplexes being defined by stick-breaking and so on.
There are other choices, and it'd be a great research project to explore how they compare in terms of sampling.
The obvious people to supervise such an effort would be Michael or Ben or Marcus.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My intuition is that the well-posed transformations will all end up being
equivalent (as we’ve seen with the simplex transformations) but it’s
definitely worth exploring and writing up. The whole “map to R^{n}” is
an important principle that is rarely discussed in the statistical literature
but is crucial for efficient algorithms.
Stan makes some particular constraint choices to map between constrained and unconstrained parameterizations, such as covariance matrices being Cholesky factors on the unconstrained scale and simplexes being defined by stick-breaking and so on.
There are other choices, and it'd be a great research project to explore how they compare in terms of sampling.
The obvious people to supervise such an effort would be Michael or Ben or Marcus.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
I'd be happy to help supervise this if there is an interested student. I've actually started doing some work along these lines for parameterizing S^n which I really need to get around to finishing up and publishing...
Stan makes some particular constraint choices to map between constrained and unconstrained parameterizations, such as covariance matrices being Cholesky factors on the unconstrained scale and simplexes being defined by stick-breaking and so on.
There are other choices, and it'd be a great research project to explore how they compare in terms of sampling.
The obvious people to supervise such an effort would be Michael or Ben or Marcus.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: