Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

constraint geometry research project #642

Closed
bob-carpenter opened this issue May 9, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

constraint geometry research project #642

bob-carpenter opened this issue May 9, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@bob-carpenter
Copy link
Contributor

Stan makes some particular constraint choices to map between constrained and unconstrained parameterizations, such as covariance matrices being Cholesky factors on the unconstrained scale and simplexes being defined by stick-breaking and so on.

There are other choices, and it'd be a great research project to explore how they compare in terms of sampling.

The obvious people to supervise such an effort would be Michael or Ben or Marcus.

@bob-carpenter bob-carpenter added this to the Future milestone May 9, 2014
@betanalpha
Copy link
Contributor

My intuition is that the well-posed transformations will all end up being
equivalent (as we’ve seen with the simplex transformations) but it’s
definitely worth exploring and writing up. The whole “map to R^{n}” is
an important principle that is rarely discussed in the statistical literature
but is crucial for efficient algorithms.

On May 9, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Bob Carpenter notifications@github.com wrote:

Stan makes some particular constraint choices to map between constrained and unconstrained parameterizations, such as covariance matrices being Cholesky factors on the unconstrained scale and simplexes being defined by stick-breaking and so on.

There are other choices, and it'd be a great research project to explore how they compare in terms of sampling.

The obvious people to supervise such an effort would be Michael or Ben or Marcus.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@mbrubake
Copy link
Member

mbrubake commented May 9, 2014

I'd be happy to help supervise this if there is an interested student. I've actually started doing some work along these lines for parameterizing S^n which I really need to get around to finishing up and publishing...

@syclik
Copy link
Member

syclik commented Jul 21, 2016

Closing this cause it's not really an issue. We should pick this up on a wiki or in a longer todo.

@syclik syclik closed this as completed Jul 21, 2016
@syclik syclik modified the milestones: Future, v2.11.0 Jul 27, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants