Release 0.1.4 #300
Merged
Release 0.1.4 #300
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I made a few editorial suggestions in the files of the standard as I was reading through.
Good suggestion. Co-Authored-By: Elena FdR <ElenaFdR@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Boris van Hoytema <boris@publiccode.net>
Co-Authored-By: Boris van Hoytema <boris@publiccode.net>
Co-Authored-By: Boris van Hoytema <boris@publiccode.net>
Co-Authored-By: Boris van Hoytema <boris@publiccode.net>
Added license in the metadata of the files
AUTHORS.md: add Jan Ainali
Link to Semantic Versioning Specification in Further reading
While it is implied that code and docs are not required to share a license, the previous wording could be read in such a way as to suggest that they MUST. This commit simplifies the language and removes this possible mis-reading.
Minor editorial tweaks
Simplify & avoid 'code and docs under "a" licnese'
fixed a typo and removed a forgotten )
Added periods to all criteria list items that missed it, for consistency
Rewords reference in introduction to remove ambiguity. "Which" could refer to both the public code as the traditional model, which can be confusing. Rewords the example for general public in the glossary. The previous wording was a bit confusing to me. I had to reread it a few times before I realized that it aligned with my intuition. Clarifies that code should be accessible without authorization. This may be a bit pedantic, but one could imagine codebases which are secured with a password. That would not require authentication but would require authorization. Neither seems desirable. Fixes a minor grammatical issue in the plain English criteria page. Avoids repetition of document base within a sentence.
Minor phrasing changes in introduction and criteria pages
minor wordsmithing and link added to the license
Add repo link
split into two lines, workaround for mashed links
Removed extra dot
ericherman
commented
Nov 28, 2019
Ainali
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2019
bvhme
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
View rendered AUTHORS.md
View rendered CHANGELOG.md
View rendered CONTRIBUTING.md
View rendered README.md
View rendered criteria/advertise-maturity.md
View rendered criteria/bundle-policy-and-code.md
View rendered criteria/code-in-the-open.md
View rendered criteria/continuous-integration.md
View rendered criteria/document-objectives.md
View rendered criteria/documenting.md
View rendered criteria/open-licenses.md
View rendered criteria/open-standards.md
View rendered criteria/open-to-contributions.md
View rendered criteria/require-review.md
View rendered criteria/reusable-and-portable-codebases.md
View rendered criteria/style.md
View rendered criteria/understandable-english-first.md
View rendered criteria/version-control-and-history.md
View rendered glossary.md
View rendered introduction.md
View rendered readers-guide.md