Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Considering return-await rule #199

Closed
mightyiam opened this issue Dec 24, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #253
Closed

Considering return-await rule #199

mightyiam opened this issue Dec 24, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #253

Comments

@mightyiam
Copy link
Owner

I'd like some input regarding the possible inclusion of the return-await rule, please. I've also asked upstream.

@mightyiam
Copy link
Owner Author

The upstream input (@bradzacher) made good points, I feel.

mightyiam added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2020
BREAKING CHANGE: new rule return-await with in-try-catch option.

Closes #199.
mightyiam added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2020
BREAKING CHANGE: new rule return-await with in-try-catch option.

Closes #199.
mightyiam added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2020
BREAKING CHANGE: new rule return-await with in-try-catch option.

Closes #199.
mightyiam added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2020
BREAKING CHANGE: new rule @typescript-eslint/return-await always

Closes #199.
@mightyiam
Copy link
Owner Author

I feel like a decision should be made and the reported debugging benefits of always outweigh potential micro-optimization concerns of it.

mightyiam added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2020
BREAKING CHANGE: new rule @typescript-eslint/return-await always

Closes #199.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant