Implement account provider

[sanlee42]

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Other information

[sanlee42]

the private key provider can implement by local db provider through import key.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3259 (0691705) into master (abb263c) will increase coverage by 0.21%.
The diff coverage is 16.49%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3259      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   31.78%   31.98%   +0.21%     
==========================================
  Files         493      499       +6     
  Lines       46062    46240     +178     
  Branches    21152    21215      +63     
==========================================
+ Hits        14635    14787     +152     
+ Misses      17429    17425       -4     
- Partials    13998    14028      +30     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	31.98% <16.49%> (+0.21%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
account/api/src/lib.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
account/provider/src/local_provider.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
config/src/lib.rs	35.06% <0.00%> (+2.65%)	⬆️
account/provider/src/provider/mod.rs	10.00% <10.00%> (ø)
cmd/starcoin/src/dev/tests.rs	14.96% <14.29%> (+1.55%)	⬆️
account/provider/src/rpc_provider.rs	18.37% <18.37%> (ø)
cmd/starcoin/src/cli_state.rs	48.79% <37.50%> (-1.21%)	⬇️
config/src/account_provider_config.rs	52.18% <52.18%> (ø)
account/api/src/provider.rs	75.00% <75.00%> (ø)
account/provider/src/lib.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 91 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update abb263c...0691705. Read the comment docs.

[jolestar]

LGTM

1. cmd 的集成测试现在临时被注释掉了，可以在本地运行一下，确保命令行兼容没问题。
2. 进一步需要增加一些 local provider 的测试用例。
3. 需要补充一些 local provider 的使用文档（Readme.md 里的例子也可以更新一下）。

[github-actions]

Benchmark for e36339e

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
accumulator_append	590.9±9.54µs	592.6±22.74µs	+0.29%
block_apply/block_apply_10	269.2±1.69ms	269.7±0.91ms	+0.19%
block_apply/block_apply_1000	27.6±0.03s	27.7±0.02s	+0.36%
get_with_proof/db_store	36.4±0.80µs	36.4±2.04µs	0.00%
get_with_proof/mem_store	31.0±0.69µs	31.3±0.29µs	+0.97%
put_and_commit/db_store/1	94.6±4.90µs	95.5±5.50µs	+0.95%
put_and_commit/db_store/10	852.6±41.51µs	847.4±40.51µs	-0.61%
put_and_commit/db_store/100	7.3±0.31ms	7.3±0.32ms	0.00%
put_and_commit/db_store/5	441.2±24.22µs	433.1±22.33µs	-1.84%
put_and_commit/db_store/50	3.8±0.17ms	3.8±0.15ms	0.00%
put_and_commit/mem_store/1	61.4±5.63µs	61.0±5.53µs	-0.65%
put_and_commit/mem_store/10	573.2±48.02µs	572.6±47.43µs	-0.10%
put_and_commit/mem_store/100	5.6±0.80ms	5.6±0.81ms	0.00%
put_and_commit/mem_store/5	288.8±23.92µs	291.3±24.70µs	+0.87%
put_and_commit/mem_store/50	2.8±0.18ms	2.8±0.18ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(100)	3.8±0.10ms	3.8±0.10ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(1000)	38.6±0.99ms	38.3±0.64ms	-0.78%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(10000)	390.2±8.80ms	385.4±5.19ms	-1.23%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(100)	959.4±14.45µs	951.2±15.39µs	-0.85%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(1000)	9.5±0.11ms	9.5±0.07ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(10000)	96.1±0.89ms	93.9±0.94ms	-2.29%
storage_transaction	1055.6±295.82µs	1077.3±342.21µs	+2.06%
vm/transaction_execution/1	315.1±0.79ms	317.0±0.96ms	+0.60%
vm/transaction_execution/10	99.0±0.41ms	99.2±0.55ms	+0.20%
vm/transaction_execution/20	91.0±0.58ms	95.7±11.04ms	+5.16%
vm/transaction_execution/5	121.5±1.05ms	121.7±0.82ms	+0.16%
vm/transaction_execution/50	103.4±1.16ms	103.5±1.01ms	+0.10%

[github-actions]

Benchmark for 3f64cff

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
accumulator_append	602.0±13.27µs	588.1±11.62µs	-2.31%
block_apply/block_apply_10	266.8±1.04ms	267.6±1.45ms	+0.30%
block_apply/block_apply_1000	27.1±0.05s	27.4±0.06s	+1.11%
get_with_proof/db_store	36.2±0.30µs	35.7±0.32µs	-1.38%
get_with_proof/mem_store	31.2±0.34µs	31.3±0.27µs	+0.32%
put_and_commit/db_store/1	97.4±4.68µs	94.6±4.65µs	-2.87%
put_and_commit/db_store/10	850.4±42.79µs	854.5±39.44µs	+0.48%
put_and_commit/db_store/100	7.3±0.31ms	7.3±0.30ms	0.00%
put_and_commit/db_store/5	434.0±22.73µs	434.3±28.30µs	+0.07%
put_and_commit/db_store/50	3.8±0.16ms	3.8±0.18ms	0.00%
put_and_commit/mem_store/1	61.4±5.48µs	61.3±5.45µs	-0.16%
put_and_commit/mem_store/10	573.4±46.39µs	573.9±48.53µs	+0.09%
put_and_commit/mem_store/100	5.6±0.81ms	5.6±0.81ms	0.00%
put_and_commit/mem_store/5	289.1±24.36µs	292.8±23.68µs	+1.28%
put_and_commit/mem_store/50	2.8±0.18ms	2.8±0.18ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(100)	3.9±0.12ms	3.9±0.07ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(1000)	39.1±0.95ms	39.1±1.10ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(10000)	389.4±7.53ms	389.1±7.40ms	-0.08%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(100)	959.7±6.48µs	926.0±9.69µs	-3.51%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(1000)	9.6±0.08ms	9.3±0.09ms	-3.12%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(10000)	95.4±0.52ms	92.4±0.68ms	-3.14%
storage_transaction	1071.7±332.25µs	1035.8±232.70µs	-3.35%
vm/transaction_execution/1	318.3±1.27ms	317.4±1.92ms	-0.28%
vm/transaction_execution/10	99.9±0.75ms	99.1±0.39ms	-0.80%
vm/transaction_execution/20	92.9±2.82ms	91.8±1.10ms	-1.18%
vm/transaction_execution/5	122.0±0.42ms	121.7±0.99ms	-0.25%
vm/transaction_execution/50	104.0±1.50ms	103.6±1.07ms	-0.38%