SHA256 check for v0.48.0 #2059
-
Hello, thank you for everyone who created and contributes to starship.
any help is appreciated Reference file: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
@henrythebuilder, thanks for catching this! Due to an issue in GH Actions CI, the linux-gnu binary/hashes for the v0.48.0 release weren't autogenerated like they usually are, but manually compiled and built on my machine. It looks like I was moving a little too fast and accidentally SHA-summed the binary executable instead of the tar file--if you untar the file and hash the binary, you should get the old sum. I've updated the release with the correct hash for the tarball. Thanks for letting us know! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for your work 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@henrythebuilder, thanks for catching this!
Due to an issue in GH Actions CI, the linux-gnu binary/hashes for the v0.48.0 release weren't autogenerated like they usually are, but manually compiled and built on my machine. It looks like I was moving a little too fast and accidentally SHA-summed the binary executable instead of the tar file--if you untar the file and hash the binary, you should get the old sum.
I've updated the release with the correct hash for the tarball. Thanks for letting us know!