Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name conflicts for mamba #3

Open
jbednar opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Name conflicts for mamba #3

jbednar opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@jbednar
Copy link

jbednar commented Dec 4, 2023

This looks like a cool project, but the name seems problematic because of the pre-existing package manager Mamba. The Mamba SSM installation instructions currently suggest installing with pip, but Mamba SSM could very soon be available as a conda package, and then you'll have instructions like mamba install mamba-ssm, which seems very, very confusing!

@mcg1969
Copy link

mcg1969 commented Dec 4, 2023

Indeed, mamba is reserved on PyPi for yet a different mamba: https://pypi.org/project/mamba/

@trap20
Copy link

trap20 commented Dec 4, 2023

There also is a Llama2 fine tune called mamba: https://huggingface.co/CobraMamba

@mcg1969
Copy link

mcg1969 commented Dec 4, 2023

To be fair! The official Python name of this package is mamba_ssm https://pypi.org/project/mamba-ssm/

So I think we're good from a pip and conda perspective!

@jbednar
Copy link
Author

jbednar commented Dec 5, 2023

If it's consistently called "Mamba SSM", there's no problem! But the name of this repo, its readme, and the announcement all just use Mamba, so I'd bet lots of people will try to "pip install mamba".

@josejg
Copy link

josejg commented Dec 7, 2023

Seems like Gemini can't tell the two projects apart (see the generated github link)

image

From: https://twitter.com/mvpatel2000/status/1732496433318592842

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants