Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Root out SCXML-related wrappers #3971

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 11, 2023
Merged

Root out SCXML-related wrappers #3971

merged 8 commits into from
May 11, 2023

Conversation

Andarist
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 20, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 19fa892

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
xstate Major

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Apr 20, 2023

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 19fa892:

Sandbox Source
XState Example Template Configuration
XState React Template Configuration

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 20, 2023

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review

Review these changes using an interactive CodeSee Map

Legend

CodeSee Map legend

# Conflicts:
#	packages/core/src/actions.ts
#	packages/core/src/actions/raise.ts
#	packages/core/src/actions/send.ts
#	packages/core/src/interpreter.ts
#	packages/xstate-test/src/utils.ts
Copy link
Member

@davidkpiano davidkpiano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just skimmed this; it's looking good 👍

@Andarist Andarist marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2023 14:03
) {
throw scxmlEvent.data.data;
throw (event as any).data;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
throw (event as any).data;
// TODO: type as an error event
throw (event as any).data;

Comment on lines 41 to 48
data: (event as any).data,
input: undefined
};
case rejectEventType:
return {
...state,
status: 'error',
data: eventObject.data,
data: (event as any).data,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are the types failing here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

managed to fix this in a different way now, thanks for the call out

Copy link
Member

@davidkpiano davidkpiano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some nits, LGTM 🚢

@Andarist Andarist merged commit d0ba42c into next May 11, 2023
2 checks passed
@Andarist Andarist deleted the remoe-scxml-event branch May 11, 2023 15:00
@Andarist Andarist restored the remoe-scxml-event branch August 21, 2023 13:39
@Andarist Andarist deleted the remoe-scxml-event branch August 21, 2023 13:40
@Andarist Andarist mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants