Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid selecting always transitions when the preceeding transition doesn't change the state #4371

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

Andarist
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 19, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 7034df5

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
xstate Major

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Oct 19, 2023

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 7034df5:

Sandbox Source
XState Example Template Configuration
XState React Template Configuration

@Andarist Andarist changed the title Do not select the same always transitions right after executing them Avoid selecting always transitions when the preceeding transition doesn't change the state Oct 20, 2023
@@ -1621,7 +1626,7 @@ export function macrostep(
false,
internalQueue
);

shouldSelectEventlessTransitions = nextState !== previousState;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's worth noting that this also checks non-always transitions here. This check also doesn't cover the first selectTransitions+microstep within this macrostep.

To be more consistent we should either:

  • check the same for that first microstep
  • or only check this after executing an always transition

Which one sounds better to you?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think "or only check this after executing an always transition" sounds better

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree and I've pushed out an according change

@Andarist Andarist merged commit 8b3f664 into next Oct 20, 2023
2 checks passed
@Andarist Andarist deleted the ignore-same-always-transitions branch October 20, 2023 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants