Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Tests for explicit conversion operators, along with a fix to avoid
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
considering explicit conversion operators when determining surrogate
functions. Fixes PR10453. Note that there are a few test cases where
Clang is still wrong because it does not implement DR899; see PR10456.

Patch by Jonathan Sauer!


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@135857 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
  • Loading branch information
DougGregor committed Jul 23, 2011
1 parent 2d3ba4f commit bf6e317
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 155 additions and 12 deletions.
27 changes: 15 additions & 12 deletions lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9384,8 +9384,8 @@ Sema::BuildCallToObjectOfClassType(Scope *S, Expr *Obj,
}

// C++ [over.call.object]p2:
// In addition, for each conversion function declared in T of the
// form
// In addition, for each (non-explicit in C++0x) conversion function
// declared in T of the form
//
// operator conversion-type-id () cv-qualifier;
//
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -9415,16 +9415,19 @@ Sema::BuildCallToObjectOfClassType(Scope *S, Expr *Obj,
continue;

CXXConversionDecl *Conv = cast<CXXConversionDecl>(D);

// Strip the reference type (if any) and then the pointer type (if
// any) to get down to what might be a function type.
QualType ConvType = Conv->getConversionType().getNonReferenceType();
if (const PointerType *ConvPtrType = ConvType->getAs<PointerType>())
ConvType = ConvPtrType->getPointeeType();

if (const FunctionProtoType *Proto = ConvType->getAs<FunctionProtoType>())
AddSurrogateCandidate(Conv, I.getPair(), ActingContext, Proto,
Object.get(), Args, NumArgs, CandidateSet);
if (!Conv->isExplicit()) {
// Strip the reference type (if any) and then the pointer type (if
// any) to get down to what might be a function type.
QualType ConvType = Conv->getConversionType().getNonReferenceType();
if (const PointerType *ConvPtrType = ConvType->getAs<PointerType>())
ConvType = ConvPtrType->getPointeeType();

if (const FunctionProtoType *Proto = ConvType->getAs<FunctionProtoType>())
{
AddSurrogateCandidate(Conv, I.getPair(), ActingContext, Proto,
Object.get(), Args, NumArgs, CandidateSet);
}
}
}

// Perform overload resolution.
Expand Down
140 changes: 140 additions & 0 deletions test/SemaCXX/explicit.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,4 +36,144 @@ namespace Conversion {
void f(A a, B b) {
b.f(a);
}

void testExplicit()
{
// Taken from 12.3.2p2
class Y { }; // expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'Conversion::Z' to 'const Conversion::Y &' for 1st argument}} \
expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'Conversion::Z' to 'const Conversion::Y &' for 1st argument}} \
expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'Conversion::Z' to 'const Conversion::Y' for 1st argument}} \
expected-note {{andidate constructor (the implicit default constructor) not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided}} \
expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'Conversion::Z' to 'const Conversion::Y' for 1st argument}} \
expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit default constructor) not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided}} \
expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'Conversion::Z' to 'const Conversion::Y' for 1st argument}} \
expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit default constructor) not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided}}
struct Z {
explicit operator Y() const;
explicit operator int() const;
};

Z z;
// 13.3.1.4p1 & 8.5p16:
Y y2 = z; // expected-error {{no viable conversion from 'Conversion::Z' to 'Conversion::Y'}}
// FIXME: These are well-formed per C++0x 13.3.1.4p1 (see DR899).
Y y3 = (Y)z; // expected-error {{no matching conversion for C-style cast from 'Conversion::Z' to 'Conversion::Y''}}
Y y4 = Y(z); // expected-error {{no matching conversion for functional-style cast from 'Conversion::Z' to 'Conversion::Y'}}
Y y5 = static_cast<Y>(z); // expected-error {{no matching conversion for static_cast from 'Conversion::Z' to 'Conversion::Y'}}
// 13.3.1.5p1 & 8.5p16:
int i1 = (int)z;
int i2 = int(z);
int i3 = static_cast<int>(z);
int i4(z);
// 13.3.1.6p1 & 8.5.3p5:
const Y& y6 = z; // expected-error {{no viable conversion from 'Conversion::Z' to 'const Conversion::Y'}}
const int& y7(z);
}

void testBool() {
struct Bool {
operator bool();
};

struct NotBool {
explicit operator bool(); // expected-note {{conversion to integral type 'bool'}}
};
Bool b;
NotBool n;

(void) (1 + b);
(void) (1 + n); // expected-error {{invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'Conversion::NotBool')}}

// 5.3.1p9:
(void) (!b);
(void) (!n);

// 5.14p1:
(void) (b && true);
(void) (n && true);

// 5.15p1:
(void) (b || true);
(void) (n || true);

// 5.16p1:
(void) (b ? 0 : 1);
(void) (n ? 0: 1);

// 5.19p5:
// TODO: After constexpr has been implemented

// 6.4p4:
if (b) {}
if (n) {}

// 6.4.2p2:
switch (b) {} // expected-warning {{switch condition has boolean value}}
switch (n) {} // expected-error {{switch condition type 'Conversion::NotBool' requires explicit conversion to 'bool'}} \
expected-warning {{switch condition has boolean value}}

// 6.5.1:
while (b) {}
while (n) {}

// 6.5.2p1:
do {} while (b);
do {} while (n);

// 6.5.3:
for (;b;) {}
for (;n;) {}
}

void testNew()
{
// 5.3.4p6:
struct Int {
operator int();
};
struct NotInt {
explicit operator int(); // expected-note {{conversion to integral type 'int' declared here}}
};

Int i;
NotInt ni;

new int[i];
new int[ni]; // expected-error {{array size expression of type 'Conversion::NotInt' requires explicit conversion to type 'int'}}
}

void testDelete()
{
// 5.3.5pp2:
struct Ptr {
operator int*();
};
struct NotPtr {
explicit operator int*();
};

Ptr p;
NotPtr np;

delete p;
delete np; // expected-error {{cannot delete expression of type 'Conversion::NotPtr'}}
}

void testFunctionPointer()
{
// 13.3.1.1.2p2:
using Func = void(*)(int);

struct FP {
operator Func();
};
struct NotFP {
explicit operator Func();
};

FP fp;
NotFP nfp;
fp(1);
nfp(1); // expected-error {{type 'Conversion::NotFP' does not provide a call operator}}
}
}

0 comments on commit bf6e317

Please sign in to comment.