Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multisig example #207

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 13, 2017
Merged

Multisig example #207

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 13, 2017

Conversation

bonustrack
Copy link
Contributor

Add example using multi-signature for broadcast a vote.

@bonustrack bonustrack merged commit 1883be1 into master Jul 13, 2017
@bonustrack bonustrack deleted the multisig-example branch July 13, 2017 06:33
Copy link
Contributor

@p0o p0o left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great feature 👍

const steem = require('../lib');

const privWif1 = '5K2LA2ucS8b1GuFvVgZK6itKNE6fFMbDMX4GDtNHiczJESLGRd8';
const privWif2 = '5JRaypasxMx1L97ZUX7YuC5Psb5EAbF821kkAGtBj7xCJFQcbLg';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these real posting WIFs? Maybe you don't want to put them hardcoded here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes they are, it doesn't matter as it's just posting private WIF of disposable accounts, having them hardcoded make easier for dev to test multi-sig.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants