Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Instead of refusing post reward, automatic burning option #848

Closed
Team-Steem opened this issue Feb 5, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Instead of refusing post reward, automatic burning option #848

Team-Steem opened this issue Feb 5, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@Team-Steem
Copy link

Would this make any sense? Could this be gamed?

Burning reward instead of refusing them this would encourage people to vote for a post if people get their curation rewards and still allow the post to have more visibility.

This is just a small idea.

@xeroc
Copy link

xeroc commented Feb 7, 2017

To my understanding, this is exactly what happens if you refuse payout. Refused payouts are burned

@mvandeberg
Copy link
Contributor

mvandeberg commented Feb 7, 2017

To my understanding, this is exactly what happens if you refuse payout. Refused payouts are burned

That is incorrect. Refused payouts are returned to the reward fund to be reallocated.

@samupaha
Copy link

I think this is a great idea. Everything that decreases the amount of liquid steem is good for the price of steem.

@iamsmooth
Copy link

I believe it has been pointed out that this can be implemented with the HF17 reward sharing feature by setting null as reward recipient.

@mvandeberg
Copy link
Contributor

Because the requested behavior can be implemented using existing features, I am closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants