Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Carry-all should drop at nearby free location instead of randomly guessing where to drop #244

Closed
stefanhendriks opened this issue Aug 16, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Carry-all should drop at nearby free location instead of randomly guessing where to drop #244

stefanhendriks opened this issue Aug 16, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
improvement Quality of life or general improvement of a game mechanic
Projects
D2TM
Milestone
v0.6.0

Comments

@stefanhendriks
Copy link
Owner

Currently, when a carry-all is unable to drop a unit, it changes randomly the cell where to try dropping a unit. This can lead to a carry-all trying to drop a unit on several wrong locations.

Instead, make this more intelligent and let carry-all scan for area where a free space is to drop unit.
@stefanhendriks stefanhendriks created this issue from a note in D2TM (Todo for next release) Aug 16, 2021
@stefanhendriks stefanhendriks added the improvement Quality of life or general improvement of a game mechanic label Aug 16, 2021
@stefanhendriks stefanhendriks added this to the v0.6.0 milestone Aug 16, 2021
@stefanhendriks stefanhendriks moved this from Todo for next release to In progress in D2TM Aug 16, 2021
D2TM automation moved this from In progress to Done Aug 16, 2021
This was referenced Aug 16, 2021
Closed
Closed
@stefanhendriks stefanhendriks moved this from Done to Version 0.6.0 (Released) in D2TM Sep 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
improvement Quality of life or general improvement of a game mechanic
Projects
D2TM
  
Version 0.6.0 (Released)
Milestone
v0.6.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@stefanhendriks