You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to reactivate different colors for the buildings based on metrics. The colors should start with green #00ff00 and go all the way to red #ff0000 based on the max metric etc.
I also would like to discuss the colors if no metric for the color is selected. I would vote for a single color instead of a random color for each platform / package. Why?
Although there is no information hidden, the colors attract the visual scope of the user. As a result, some users start to think about the colors of the packages although they are random
The more different "information" (color) is visible, it is harder to understand.
On the other hand, the different colors seperate the packages. What do you think?
I created this new issue to focus on the SQ release. #8 was moved to the second milestone for now as i don't see it as mandatory. Ok?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I will remove the Rule "color-per-package", so initially all houses have the same color.
If it's not too much trouble i will add a few color-options to the Frontend (Depending on how difficult it is, to send options from the Frontend to the model)
If it's possible the following Rules/Metrics come to mind:
Package name (I mean, the rule is already there...)
I would like to reactivate different colors for the buildings based on metrics. The colors should start with green #00ff00 and go all the way to red #ff0000 based on the max metric etc.
I also would like to discuss the colors if no metric for the color is selected. I would vote for a single color instead of a random color for each platform / package. Why?
On the other hand, the different colors seperate the packages. What do you think?
I created this new issue to focus on the SQ release. #8 was moved to the second milestone for now as i don't see it as mandatory. Ok?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: