Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SDF timing checks are currently not implemented #945

Open
Tracked by #943
mole99 opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #943

SDF timing checks are currently not implemented #945

mole99 opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement specify/SDF Bugs/limitations in specify block or SDF support

Comments

@mole99
Copy link
Contributor

mole99 commented Jun 15, 2023

Within TIMINGCHECK the following timing checks are currently only parsed, not implemented:

  • K_SETUP
  • K_HOLD
  • K_SETUPHOLD
  • K_RECOVERY
  • K_RECREM
  • K_REMOVAL
  • K_WIDTH
  • K_PERIOD
@mole99 mole99 mentioned this issue Jun 14, 2023
Open
9 tasks
@caryr
Copy link
Collaborator

caryr commented Sep 4, 2023

The pr1520314 test is failing when testing vlog95 generation. This is because of the delayed signal generation not being quite correct. This is not a critical issue, but it will need to be fixed when actually implementing the timing checks that allow delayed signals.

@caryr caryr added the specify/SDF Bugs/limitations in specify block or SDF support label Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Enhancement specify/SDF Bugs/limitations in specify block or SDF support
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@caryr @mole99