Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow active Trammlines without turned on seeder #10

Closed
Snickers125 opened this issue Jun 29, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Allow active Trammlines without turned on seeder #10

Snickers125 opened this issue Jun 29, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
@stijnwop
Labels
enhancement New feature or request fixed

Comments

@Snickers125
Copy link
Contributor

More like a feature request, I would highly recommend active trammline marker without turned on seeder to get better matching on endrows
stijnwop added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2020
@stijnwop
[#10] Allow tramline marking without processed work areas.
9be43fb
@stijnwop stijnwop added enhancement New feature or request fixed labels Jun 29, 2020
@stijnwop stijnwop self-assigned this Jun 29, 2020
@stijnwop stijnwop removed the fixed label Jun 30, 2020
@stijnwop
Copy link
Owner

Introduces the bug that it will create tramlines in any circumstance.

Look into making it dependent on the ground reference node of the seeder.

@stijnwop stijnwop reopened this Jun 30, 2020
@Snickers125 Snickers125 mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2020
Closed
stijnwop added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2020
@stijnwop
[#10] Allow for tramline creation when seeder is turned off but lower…
ec6bae9 
…ed on accessible fields.
@stijnwop
Copy link
Owner

Try again

@stijnwop stijnwop added the fixed label Aug 21, 2020
@Snickers125
Copy link
Contributor Author

I call that a wonderfull fix!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stijnwop stijnwop

Labels
enhancement New feature or request fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@stijnwop @Snickers125