Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add {data.table} to example benchmarks for comparison #5

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 11, 2021

Conversation

feinmann
Copy link
Contributor

It would be very cool to include {data.table} into the comparison since it is really performant and adds only one dependency. For a fair comparison the author would have to run the benchmark on the own machine, please. {data.table} is very common, as common as {dplyr}, with a very nice syntax.

It would be very cool to include {data.table} into the comparison since it is really performant and adds only one dependency. For a fair comparison the author would have to run the benchmark on the own machine, please. {data.table} is very common, as common as {dplyr}, with a very nice syntax.
@storopoli
Copy link
Owner

Very nice syntax is quite subjective 😂

What if we created a footnote pointing readers towards this benchmarks on DataFrames

@feinmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

You are absolutely right. But what I really find impressive is how performant {data.table} is in the end. I use it every day and think it could be an interesting match with Julia-folks. I would like the footnote. Thank you.

@feinmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was looking into the Footnotes-reference, but I am not sure how you would prefer the note... I really think this could be a good information for your readers.

- {data.table} version 1.14.0
- link to benchmark from the makers of {data.table}
_literate/1_why_Julia.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
_literate/1_why_Julia.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@feinmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, the adjusted footnote is very helpful, I think. Let`s focus on Julia :)

@storopoli
Copy link
Owner

Ok, then could you make a commit with only that so that we can merge this PR?

@storopoli
Copy link
Owner

Great! Thanks @feinmann

@storopoli storopoli merged commit fcd7b69 into storopoli:master May 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants