Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bollard type: Foldable or removable with key? #3116

Closed
westnordost opened this issue Aug 3, 2021 · 22 comments
Closed

Bollard type: Foldable or removable with key? #3116

westnordost opened this issue Aug 3, 2021 · 22 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@westnordost
Copy link
Member

It is unclear how to answer the bollard quest for foldable bollards that are foldable with a key.

20210803_184143

@westnordost westnordost added the bug label Aug 3, 2021
@westnordost
Copy link
Member Author

@FloEdelmann

@FloEdelmann
Copy link
Member

I've also noticed this while surveying. We could solve this similar to the "removable with key" and "removable without key" options that both tag bollard=removable:

enum class BollardType(val osmValue: String) {
RISING("rising"),
REMOVABLE_WITH_KEY("removable"),
REMOVABLE_WITHOUT_KEY("removable"),
FOLDABLE("foldable"),
FLEXIBLE("flexible"),
FIXED("fixed"),
}

So, split the current "foldable" option into:

  • "foldable with key" (with a new image that has both the foldable part and the keyhole/lock in detail) which tags bollard=foldable
  • "foldable without key" (with the current "foldable" image) which also tags bollard=foldable

@RubenKelevra what do you think?

@westnordost
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, it's actually not a tagging problem then... maybe, why not remove the "with a key" option and just write "removable (with or without key)", same with foldable?

@RubenKelevra
Copy link
Contributor

Foldables are always removable with a key. :)

Or have you encountered one which is foldable without a key?

@RubenKelevra
Copy link
Contributor

The main issue is actually that bollards removable without key are actually pretty hard to remove by hand. So it takes more time to remove them than those which can be unlocked with a key. :)

@westnordost
Copy link
Member Author

Sure, but if whether it requires a key or not doesn't matter for the tagging, then this shouldn't be made a subject for the user.

@mnalis

This comment has been minimized.

@RubenKelevra
Copy link
Contributor

Well, the key in this case is not a real key but a utility key. Fire fighters etc have this one to put them down.

@matkoniecz

This comment has been minimized.

@RubenKelevra
Copy link
Contributor

@matkoniecz actually no. You're fine to drive through them with your motorcycle. They only omit traffic that is too wide to pass by.

Only signs disallow specific traffic to pass by law.

So the only thing you can obviously tag is "maximal width" :)

@westnordost
Copy link
Member Author

westnordost commented Aug 4, 2021

Okay, so is there actually any reason for having two pictures in the quest, one "removable with key" and one "removable without key"? If the reason was to avoid confusion, well, I was confused exactly by that.

@Helium314
Copy link
Collaborator

There were some bollards where I didn't answer the quest because I didn't know whether a key is required for removal. If it doesn't go into any tag, I don't want to bother checking for a lock...

@mnalis

This comment has been minimized.

@Helium314

This comment has been minimized.

@matkoniecz

This comment has been minimized.

@mnalis

This comment has been minimized.

@westnordost
Copy link
Member Author

I hid the posts talking about access=private because this if off topic - in this quest, the bollard and only the bollard is tagged, not the road "behind" it.

So, my current suggestion would be #3116 (comment) . Are there any better ideas or counter-arguments?

@mnalis

This comment has been minimized.

@westnordost

This comment has been minimized.

@mnalis
Copy link
Member

mnalis commented Aug 16, 2021

Well, the key in this case is not a real key but a utility key. Fire fighters etc have this one to put them down.

@RubenKelevra hmmm interesting, but is it? What about these or these?

Those are much more common here in Croatia, and they do have a custom key (which I'm actually dubious emergency vehicle drivers have a "master" key for). Not at all like for example fire_hydrant utility keys you seem to talk about.

Wiki for bollard=removable does actually say "A bollard which can be pulled out of the ground and removed from its location to allow access, often only by the person with the key. Normally in place, and not generally passable. "

So we may have definition problem here; what is actually meant by bollard=removable at all? The one only firefighters can remove, or the one only the owner (and others with copy of key) can remove?

@RubenKelevra
Copy link
Contributor

Well removeable means you don't need any tools etc. so you can basically just pull it straight out of the ground. But they get mud/sand/stones wedged in at times, so it CAN be hard to remove.

On the other hand those with general keys the emergency crew has (triangle for example) are extremely quick to remove, since they are not actually in the ground but only have a hook which hold them.

The ones with private keys are not allowed on public streets here AFAIK. So they might get installed on private properties, but in this case I would consider them as fixed.

A fire/rescue crew can't rely on an owner to have the private key ready. They would just remove it with a grinder.

@westnordost
Copy link
Member Author

As no suggestions have been made, I will replace the selections "removable without key" and "removable with key" with "removable (with or without key)" and add "with or without key" to the foldable selection too.

@westnordost westnordost self-assigned this Aug 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants