ask about name of tourism=chalet

[matkoniecz]

---

My work on this pull request was sponsored by a NGI Zero Discovery grant

[westnordost]

I can think of examples where individual chalets do not have names: In accomodations that are essentially chalet complexes, the individual chalets may just have numbers, like room numbers. I'd expect those places usually be tagged as tourism=resort, but I am not sure if the definition of resort is so sound that it is always understood and used this way.

[matkoniecz]

In accomodations that are essentially chalet complexes, the individual chalets may just have numbers, like room numbers.

In that case I would treat tagging individual buildings with tourism=* tags as incorrect in the same way as mapping each hotel room as tourism=apartment or each gas pump at petrol station as amenity=fuel.

[westnordost]

You have a point. However, I am not even sure if tourism=resort is unmistakeably defined in the wiki (and used in practice) the way I interpret it to be, as a "collection of chalets".
So, this requires a bit of research.

[westnordost]

Actually, I just found that "resort" is not only not what I thought it is, it is also deprecated. In South East Asia, there are many places calling themselves "resort" that are this kind of collection of chalets and/or apartments.
A few years back, I mapped this island:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/11.81594/102.46438
and it turns out, I already used tourism=chalet for this kind anyway.

[westnordost]

So, this PR is fine.