You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, app.param(':id', fn) is equivalent to app.param('id', fn), which I believe is to be able to make the name look like it's the same syntax as in paths. This seems redundant and adds unnecessary complexity, and would be odd if there would someday be a way to use RFC 6570 for URLs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now,
app.param(':id', fn)
is equivalent toapp.param('id', fn)
, which I believe is to be able to make the name look like it's the same syntax as in paths. This seems redundant and adds unnecessary complexity, and would be odd if there would someday be a way to use RFC 6570 for URLs.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: