Use include_lines! macro rather than code generation.

[westonal]

Just to show an alternative approach I would take over writing code generation. It just so happens this macro exists, but even if it didn't I would write it instead of code generation.

I would expect identical performance.

[sts10]

Wow! Benchmark indeed is about the same.

I'm hesitating a little to add another dependency, but it's only 65 lines of code. I just skimmed through them -- nothing fishy that I see.

[westonal]

Sure, it also might be fun to see if you can recreate a similar macro. Take it or leave it of course, it's your project!

[westonal]

The main "smell" for me though, just FYI, is when you go to add a new word list in future, it makes sense you need to modify the code, it's suspicious that you also need to modify the build src.