Naming conventions for reference

[paulvi]

I miss naming conventions as they were displayed in previous version.

While editing them may-be not needed, having them as reference (to point junior developers to) would be great help

[stuarthendren]

ok, I could bring them back as reference. It just seem a little strange as changing them didn't seem to make much sense to me. I have also been thinking about your field naming issue #27 and that lots of people probably do use UPPER_CASE for some final fields. An option could be to select a new case
say "UPPER_CASE or lowerCamelCase" and basically pass it if either one passes the spell check. The suggestions are harder if it's wrong but I can probably figure something out.

[paulvi]

The values are perfect. IMHO, Show in read-only mode would do.