Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Support stylelint-plugin and stylelint-config package keywords #1298

Closed
4 tasks
ntwb opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Docs: Support stylelint-plugin and stylelint-config package keywords #1298

ntwb opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
status: wip is being worked on by someone type: documentation an improvement to the documentation

Comments

@ntwb
Copy link
Member

ntwb commented May 18, 2016

Currently an unofficial practice is to label stylelint plugins in package.json with the keyword styelelint-plugin, likewise for shared configs with stylelint-config, we should document this and make these as a standard for stylelint plugins and shared configs

Tasks stylelint-plugin:

Tasks stylelint-config:

** Note: Both http://stylelint.io/user-guide/configs/ and http://stylelint.io/developer-guide/configs/ document pages currently don't exist though my thinking is they should

@ntwb ntwb added status: ready to implement is ready to be worked on by someone type: documentation an improvement to the documentation status: needs discussion triage needs further discussion and removed status: ready to implement is ready to be worked on by someone labels May 18, 2016
@jeddy3
Copy link
Member

jeddy3 commented May 19, 2016

I agree we should add documentation to the developer guides.

We need to discuss the benefits of having a curated list of plugins and configs though.

The only reasons I can see for preferring a curated lists over the ones generated automatically by npmsearch are:

  1. We get to vet and bless those that appear on the curated lists.
  2. We can group and categorise items within the curated lists.

This, for me, rules out having a list of configs as neither of those reasons add much.

I can see the benefit for plugins though.

What do we think?

@davidtheclark
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed, I'd be interested in curating a plugin list but not a config list.

@jeddy3 jeddy3 added status: wip is being worked on by someone and removed status: needs discussion triage needs further discussion labels May 19, 2016
jeddy3 added a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2016
@ntwb
Copy link
Member Author

ntwb commented May 20, 2016

Cool 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: wip is being worked on by someone type: documentation an improvement to the documentation
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants