Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update at-rule-empty-line-before README with the ignore: "blockless-group" option #1461

Closed
ntwb opened this issue Jun 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Update at-rule-empty-line-before README with the ignore: "blockless-group" option #1461

ntwb opened this issue Jun 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jeddy3
Labels
status: wip is being worked on by someone type: documentation an improvement to the documentation

Comments

@ntwb
Copy link
Member

ntwb commented Jun 14, 2016 •
edited
Loading

The at-rule-empty-line-before/README.md file was not updated to include the addition of the ignore: "blockless-group" option added via #1419.

@nirazul would you be interested in fixing this up for us please?
@ntwb ntwb added status: ready to implement is ready to be worked on by someone type: documentation an improvement to the documentation labels Jun 14, 2016
@nirazul
Copy link
Contributor

nirazul commented Jun 14, 2016

I'm not sure yet if I'll find the time this week. So if somebody likes to jump in, go on.
Else I will look to it on the weekend.

@jeddy3 jeddy3 added status: wip is being worked on by someone and removed status: ready to implement is ready to be worked on by someone labels Jun 14, 2016
@jeddy3 jeddy3 self-assigned this Jun 14, 2016
jeddy3 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2016
@jeddy3
Add ignore blockless-group docs
0bff1fb 
Closes #1461
@jeddy3 jeddy3 mentioned this issue Jun 14, 2016
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jeddy3 jeddy3

Labels
status: wip is being worked on by someone type: documentation an improvement to the documentation
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@nirazul @jeddy3 @ntwb