Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor to remove reference to postcss-resolve-nested-selector #7693

Conversation

romainmenke
Copy link
Member

Which issue, if any, is this issue related to?

None

Is there anything in the PR that needs further explanation?

This rule no longer uses postcss-resolve-nested-selector directly.

Removing this part of the comment to:

  • make it easier to search for "postcss-resolve-nested-selector" and get relevant results
  • avoid confusion after the planned changes to flattenNestedSelectorsForRule in a later major

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 18, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f39c60f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@romainmenke romainmenke changed the title Remove reference to postcss-resolve-nested-selector Refactor to reference to postcss-resolve-nested-selector May 18, 2024
@romainmenke romainmenke changed the title Refactor to reference to postcss-resolve-nested-selector Refactor to remove reference to postcss-resolve-nested-selector May 18, 2024
@romainmenke romainmenke merged commit cec315e into main May 18, 2024
17 checks passed
@romainmenke romainmenke deleted the selector-max-universal--diligent-galapagos-penguin-54f8627097 branch May 18, 2024 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants