You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 10, 2021. It is now read-only.
COALTON-USER isn't a very nice package to use. Make it easy to write Coalton inside of Lisp without 100s of package qualifiers.
This will require answering the question "Can one use COMMON-LISP symbols for Coalton-defined functions?" The current answer is "no" since we define symbol macros/global static vars with those names.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
COALTON-USER
isn't a very nice package to use. Make it easy to write Coalton inside of Lisp without 100s of package qualifiers.This will require answering the question "Can one use
COMMON-LISP
symbols for Coalton-defined functions?" The current answer is "no" since we define symbol macros/global static vars with those names.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: