Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request: disable vendor prefixing completely #312

Open
eyy opened this issue Aug 20, 2015 · 7 comments
Open

Request: disable vendor prefixing completely #312

eyy opened this issue Aug 20, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@eyy
Copy link

eyy commented Aug 20, 2015

Hi. I want to use nib together with autoprefixer. The only way I found was to disable the vendor prefixin is overriding vendor-prefixes, but nib still does some work then, and then autoprefixer complains things like "You should write display: flex by final spec instead of display: box".

Maybe wrap all of the vendor file with a condition?

Thanks,
eyy

@eyy
Copy link
Author

eyy commented Aug 20, 2015

For now I write the following before importing nib:

flex-version = flex
support-for-ie = false
vendor-prefixes = official

@dbox
Copy link

dbox commented Sep 4, 2015

+1

Thanke @eyy. Solve and error for me.

@arecvlohe
Copy link

+1 same issue here

@PhiLhoSoft
Copy link

@eyy's usage of support-for-ie sounded a bit scary but it is only for old versions of IE, and apparently it only sets zoom 1 and uses -ms-filter to support opacity (from a quick search...).

I came here, via jescalan/autoprefixer-stylus#25, because Autoprefixer complained about obsolete generated Flexbox code, so it is a bit unrelated, but it doesn't hurt either.

@intermundos
Copy link

The issue is still here, in 2018.

flex-version = flex
support-for-ie = false
vendor-prefixes = official

this fixes it.

@krabbypattified
Copy link

Issue still here in 2019 :(

screenshot 2019-02-26 at 14 04 31

@g-rodigy
Copy link

@krabbypattified of course still here, last commit was in 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants