We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
in
As pointed out by @charlieegan3, we could check for more types than string + var in the "prefer in over iteration" rule.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Extend "in" check to any datatype
549bb3f
Tests only for LHS, as it felt redundant to check for both 😅 Fixes #85 Signed-off-by: Anders Eknert <anders@styra.com>
94218e3
Extend "in" check to any datatype (#87)
3c6ee58
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
As pointed out by @charlieegan3, we could check for more types than string + var in the "prefer
in
over iteration" rule.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: