-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Periodic syndication checks to IPFS Kubo #685
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 23, 2023 16:55
17c9a65
to
61a1389
Compare
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
from
October 23, 2023 17:13
61a1389
to
f7dd38d
Compare
cdata
changed the title
Periodic syndication checks to IPFS Kubo
feat: Periodic syndication checks to IPFS Kubo
Oct 23, 2023
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
8 times, most recently
from
October 23, 2023 22:07
1adba02
to
2eabbe7
Compare
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
10 times, most recently
from
October 24, 2023 23:15
28c2efb
to
a52cbb2
Compare
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
from
October 24, 2023 23:29
a52cbb2
to
264567c
Compare
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
from
October 24, 2023 23:38
264567c
to
38b5e6d
Compare
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
14 times, most recently
from
October 26, 2023 00:08
9be0f1a
to
4344c71
Compare
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
from
October 26, 2023 00:34
4344c71
to
12221ed
Compare
cdata
force-pushed
the
feat/periodic-syndication
branch
from
October 30, 2023 23:14
f61f740
to
25af2ed
Compare
jsantell
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking great, this should quiet up some tests while still surfacing issues
Merged
This was referenced Oct 31, 2023
Merged
jsantell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2023
This was referenced Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cargo-nextest
with--retries 5
for relatively lenient flake allowanceorb
more verboseWe now have a Github Workflow that reports test flakes in test runs. The report looks like this: