Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PoS tweaks #2160

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 25, 2023
Merged

PoS tweaks #2160

merged 2 commits into from Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

nazar-pc
Copy link
Member

Primarily a small plotting optimization as discussed in https://forum.subspace.network/t/should-we-use-blake3-for-proof-of-space-quality-derivation/1977/3?u=nazar-pc

Code contributor checklist:

dariolina
dariolina previously approved these changes Oct 25, 2023
Copy link
Member

@dariolina dariolina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated Dilithium spec as well (basically removed mentions of quality).

@nazar-pc
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed inverted condition and removed no longer used data structure

@nazar-pc nazar-pc added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 25, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3a33091 Oct 25, 2023
10 checks passed
@nazar-pc nazar-pc deleted the pos-tweaks branch October 25, 2023 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants