Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 23, 2019. It is now read-only.

Point to website and update description #135

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2017

Conversation

rhoggSugarcrm
Copy link
Contributor

  • Make the word "SugarCRM" on the README point to our website
  • Update the package description to correspond more closely to what we're saying in the README

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 94.22% when pulling a2c86b9 on rhoggSugarcrm:point-to-website into 508e123 on sugarcrm:master.

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Thorn [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/sugarcrm/thorn.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/sugarcrm/thorn) [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/repos/github/sugarcrm/thorn/badge.svg?branch=master)](https://coveralls.io/github/sugarcrm/thorn?branch=master)

Thorn is composed of a set of helper abstractions built to ease the process of setting up a SugarCRM instance's REST API testing environment and interacting with it.
Thorn is composed of a set of helper abstractions built to ease the process of setting up a [SugarCRM](https://www.sugarcrm.com) instance's REST API testing environment and interacting with it.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason why we're using the https over the http?
(I know it automatically redirects but wondering why..)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My personal rule for live sites is: never use plain HTTP unless HTTPS is unsupported or broken (eg. due to mixed content).

Copy link
Contributor

@jcsmorais jcsmorais left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@rhoggSugarcrm rhoggSugarcrm merged commit b5fd831 into sugarcrm:master Feb 16, 2017
@rhoggSugarcrm rhoggSugarcrm deleted the point-to-website branch February 16, 2017 18:24
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants