forked from dynexcoin/Dynex-Neuromorphic-Chip
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
3d483cc
commit c005d4a
Showing
1 changed file
with
15 additions
and
15 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
c005d4a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Greetings @dynexcoin,
It is unfortunate that you removed the earlier ticket without comment, but I value that you added some benchmarks for PalSAT. It is saddens me that you modified the ticket requesting a explanation on why you chose 3 threads for your benchmark.
However I understand that people make mistakes and propose this pull request to fix the PalSAT benchmarks to use the standard 8 thread that display that Dynex solver performance is not superior. It is only fair to acknowledge that your prototype product is not very performant. You have disabled pull requests for this account, but I request that you review this change and accept it.
If you think 3 threads are appropriate, we would value a response on why you think it is more fair than the 8 thread default used by Dynex SAT solver?
Also regarding SAT solver experts @dynexcoin, did you hear back from @arminbiere, @texmex76, @mjarvisa, @marijnheule, @quickbeam123, @Udopia and @biotomas? I really think they could learn a thing or two from picking your galaxy brain on this SAT solving topic.