Fixed SuperTextField selection glitch by never resending the previous TextEditingValue to the IME (Resolves #905) #910
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR needs #876 to land first because we use a decorate introduced in that PR. |
miguelcmedeiros
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2023
… TextEditingValue to the IME (Resolves #905)
matthew-carroll
force-pushed
the
905_fix-supertextfield-selection-glitch
branch
from
a3c3f6d
to
34a53aa
Compare
raulmabe-labhouse
pushed a commit
to LabhouseMobile/super_editor
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
… TextEditingValue to the IME (Resolves superlistapp#905) (superlistapp#910)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixed SuperTextField selection glitch by never resending the previous TextEditingValue to the IME (Resolves #905)